The United States has dismissed a reconstruction plan for Gaza proposed by Arab nations, reaffirming its own vision for the region. The rejected proposal, led by Egypt, outlined a multi-phase initiative to rebuild Gaza by 2030, clearing debris and restoring essential infrastructure while allowing Palestinians to remain in the territory. However, the US insists on a different strategy, which includes removing Hamas from power and reshaping Gaza’s governance.
A National Security Council spokesperson stated that the Arab plan does not adequately address the region’s post-war realities. “The president stands by his vision to rebuild Gaza free from Hamas. Discussions will continue to ensure peace and prosperity in the region,” the spokesperson added.
Diverging Visions for Gaza’s Future
The Arab-backed plan, endorsed by multiple regional leaders, proposes an interim administration until a reformed Palestinian Authority (PA) can take control. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has supported the initiative, pledging to hold general elections across the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem if conditions allow.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, however, has remained vague about Gaza’s post-war governance. He has expressed support for the US alternative but has not explicitly backed any governing body for the territory, rejecting both Hamas and the PA.
Challenges in Rebuilding Gaza
The $53 billion proposal includes removing unexploded ordnance, clearing over 50 million tons of rubble, and developing infrastructure such as shopping centers, an international convention hub, and an airport within five years. The plan also aims to capitalize on Gaza’s Mediterranean coast to boost tourism and economic growth.
While some Arab states have backed Egypt’s initiative, regional support remains uncertain. Notably, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates—two key financial players—were absent from the summit where the plan was discussed. Meanwhile, Algeria boycotted the meeting, citing concerns about a lack of inclusivity in the decision-making process.
Hamas Resistance and Security Concerns
A key obstacle to any reconstruction plan is disarming Hamas, a condition that the militant group refuses to accept. Senior Hamas officials have stated that their weapons are non-negotiable and will not be traded for reconstruction aid. While some leaders have hinted at willingness to step back from governance, they insist that any decision on Gaza’s future must remain an internal Palestinian matter, free from external intervention.
Uncertain Ceasefire and Rising Tensions
The fragile ceasefire in Gaza remains at risk following the expiration of its initial phase. The US has backed an alternative approach, urging Hamas to release hostages taken during the October 7, 2023, attack on southern Israel. In response, Israel has imposed severe restrictions on aid entering Gaza, aiming to pressure Hamas into accepting an agreement. The blockade has drawn criticism from international human rights groups, who argue that it violates Israel’s obligations as an occupying power under international law.
Speaking at the summit, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi emphasized that sustainable peace is impossible without a clear path to Palestinian statehood. However, Israel remains firm in its stance, insisting on long-term security control over both Gaza and the West Bank—territories Palestinians seek for their future state.
As diplomatic efforts continue, the future of Gaza hangs in the balance, with no consensus on how to rebuild and govern the war-torn region.
